Testing non-deterministic systems with confidence

Bringing statistical rigour to software testing — so engineering teams can satisfy the regulatory demands of AI performance measurement and regression testing.

The Problem

AI systems, probabilistic models, and non-deterministic processes are increasingly subject to regulatory scrutiny. Organisations must demonstrate measurable, reproducible evidence that these systems perform within acceptable bounds — not just once, but continuously.

Traditional unit testing assumes deterministic outcomes. In reality, that assumption never withstood scrutiny. But AI means we have no choice but to manage uncertainty professionally, and that means statistically.

Our Approach

Measure

Define statistical expectations for your system's behaviour. Assert against distributions, not exact values. punit gives you the vocabulary to express what "correct" means in a non-deterministic context.

Regress

Detect when your system drifts beyond acceptable bounds. Run repeatable hypothesis tests in CI/CD and catch performance degradation before it reaches production.

Trust

Produce auditable, structured evidence that your AI systems perform as expected. Give regulators, auditors, and risk committees the confidence they need.

Complementary Projects

punit examples

A complete example application demonstrating punit's capabilities — including an LLM-powered shopping basket tested with explore, measure, and optimize experiments, and a payment gateway verified against SLA thresholds.

View on GitHub

outcome

A Java framework that bridges deterministic application code with fallible, non-deterministic operations. Replaces try/catch with type-safe Outcome values, structured failure classification, policy-driven retries, and built-in observability.

View on GitHub

Insights

Introducing Javai

AI systems are increasingly subject to regulatory scrutiny, yet the testing tools available to most teams were designed for a deterministic world. Javai is here to change that.

All posts